Review: "Shelby Oaks"
Over the 36 years I’ve been reviewing movies, I can honestly say that I almost never walk out of a screening. I’m an optimist. I always allow for the fact that even the worst movie might somehow find its footing and have some redeeming value that would justify the investment of several hours of my finite mortal existence.
I walked out of Shelby Oaks.
In my defense, I gave it 15 or 20 minutes before pulling the plug.
I remember a nugget of wisdom from a film workshop or seminar that I addended many years ago that essentially said that, as a filmmaker, if you didn’t hook the audience the audience in the opening reel of the film, you were fighting a losing battle. I believe that’s true.
Great movies connect with the audience in the first ten minutes. They introduce the characters, set up the plot and make you want to watch. It’s that simple.
It’s what didn’t happen in the supernatural horror flick Shelby Oaks, another rehashing of the 1999 super hit The Blair Witch Project. That movie was made on a reported budget somewhere between $35,000 to $60,000 and went on to make an estimated $248 million. It is the most profitable movie of all time in terms of return on investment.
Not surprisingly, everyone has been trying to replicate the movie’s success over the years by cranking out the same bare-bones story made on a shoestring, indie film budget. So far, it hasn’t happened.
Blair Witch cashed in on the premise that the story was real. It was pitched as a film made from actual recovered documentary footage of a group of teens who went missing after doing some scary paranormal investigating. The story wasn’t real, but the filmmakers managed to make audiences believe that it was.
Once again, in Shelby Oaks, we have a small group of young paranormal investigators who mysteriously disappear, leaving behind some terrifyingly creepy handycam video footage. We’ve seen it before.
Early in the film, there is a shocking scene of a man putting a gun to his head, but the story is otherwise stuck in spin cycle, featuring characters delivering sluggish dialog while filmed in dark, woefully bad lighting. The writing and acting are marginal at best.
Shelby Oaks’ director is Chris Stuckmann, a young director who grew up making home movie projects with his friends. All aspiring directors try to replicate Steven Spielberg’s similar attraction to film and rise to fame. The difference is that Spielberg has genius-level talent to back up his burning childhood ambition.
Spielberg was a director who went on to make major motion pictures. Stuckmann was a YouTube movie critic now making his feature film debut.
Spielberg’s movies were fresh and original. Stuckmann’s fright flick is only derivative, at best. It doesn’t even qualify as a serious homage.
Interestingly, a very similar movie entitled House on Eden was released a few months ago. It was also a Blair Witch wannabe horror film from an internet sensation and Tik Tok star (Kris Collins) who lacked the filmmaking background to do anything more than mix the basic storyline of Blair Witch Project with the climactic ending of the 2015 movie The Witch, starring a young Anya Taylor-Joy.
We live in an age when internet stars with mega-followers are venturing into the world of feature film cinema to try to make their mark. They know that horror is currently hot at the box office. Coincidentally, both filmmakers believed that a low budget reworking of Blair Witch would be a shortcut, surefire path to success.
It wasn’t. In either case.
Shelby Oaks is rated R.
The theme of making printed information clearer makes me curious about what people notice in their own everyday experiences. Readable spacing and a clear hierarchy can change how easily someone finds a detail on a page. For Mailandbros, I would use practical print design as a starting point for a closer discussion of the subject. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. What would you check on a printed draft before producing more copies?
When it comes to keeping personal care simple and thoughtful, one clear example can stay with me longer than a long list of general points. A small consistent habit can be easier to assess than several unfamiliar changes introduced together. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring personal care ideas in connection with Mafelicita. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What would help someone decide which parts of a personal-care routine are useful to them?
I find building a personal connection with words easier to approach when there is a familiar situation to start from. A single remembered detail can give a short piece of writing a clearer sense of place. With Leandevie in mind, reading and creative writing feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. What would you keep when shortening a story without losing its atmosphere?
Considering exploring the connections behind everyday food, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. Knowing a little about how food reaches a table can make an ordinary meal more interesting. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring thoughtful food choices in connection with Italiabio. I would be interested in an example that shows how the idea works in an ordinary situation. Which questions would you ask when learning about an unfamiliar ingredient or producer?
There is something appealing about learning through hands-on creative projects, especially when the focus stays on the details people might otherwise overlook. Handling a material directly can suggest ideas that are hard to discover from a picture alone. The name Globosgladys gives this theme a memorable reference point, while creative craft projects keeps the subject in focus. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What small experiment would you try before planning a finished piece?